There are currently rumblings that the power elite are about to legislate that vaccinations be mandatory across the US. We don't know if it is true, but we know that vaccinations are not a health choice. They may be more deadly than what you want to avoid by taking them.
It was already mentioned that they are very small, and they weren't detected until 1943 with the invention of the electron microscope. Many, including HIV, have ten or fewer genes, whereas the simplest bacteria require several thousand. To create a living thing you need properly organised DNA of a substantial quantity, which the virus hasn't got.
Let's start with a medically well-known fact: viruses aren't themselves alive. They are smaller and simpler than bacteria and by themselves they are inert and harmless. So, the immediate question then has to be: How can you "catch" a virus if it isn't a living thing?
The answer is: You can't.
Experimenters have incubated viruses for the common cold, placed them directly on the mucous lining of the nose, and found that their subjects came down with colds only 12% of the time. These odds could not be increased by exposing the subjects to cold drafts, putting their feet in ice water to give them chills, or anything else that was purely physical.
Swine flu is a known viral infection, which was considered non-dangerous and normal, but for an unknown reason during an outbreak in the spring of 1918 in the US it mutated into a severe form that killed a large number of people. The medical authorities were pressurised into developing a vaccine in order to stop the spread of this now lethal disease. They conducted experiments on volunteers, which they recruited from a military prison on Deer Island in Boston harbor. The prisoners were promised complete pardon if they survived a series of rigorous tests. In order to infect the volunteers with the deadly virus they were injected with infected lung tissue taken from the dead. If this failed they had their eyes, nose and mouth sprayed with infectious aerosols. After that, they had their throats swabbed with discharges taken from the sick and dying. If all else failed, they were required to sit open-mouthed while a gravely ill person was sat up slightly and made to cough into their faces. There were sixty-two chosen volunteers. Not a single one caught the flu. The only person who did was the doctor who died soon afterwards.
One of the mysteries of viral epidemics is how it can erupt suddenly in places separated by oceans, mountain ranges and other earthly impediments. Although a virus is not alive in itself, it also loses its potential of hijacking the genetic material of a living host cell within a few hours of being outside the host body. The commonly heard answer that it travels in "carriers" (people who have no symptoms but carry and distribute the virus) cannot be proven and after decades of using it as the explanation remains nothing more than a shaky and desperate theory! It is made even more unlikely in the light of the fact that you cannot catch a viral infection, as proven above, so even if it did travel that way, how would it "jump" from the carrier to the victim?
Furthermore, how does a virus manage to lie low for several months, in the case of HIV or variant CJD we are to believe it can be up to 20 years, before erupting so explosively at more or less the same time all over? What's the trigger and why instantaneously in all those different places?
It also is a fact that some of these viral epidemics are more devastating to people in their prime than they are to infants and elderly people, who are generally considered to be more vulnerable. For some unknown reason people with a reduced resistance, a 'weaker' immune system, are seemingly more protected against infections. This has never been explained.
Sometimes viral infections that we consider eradicated will return. There are plenty of examples of this, even in our modern times, but a well-documented story is the Russian virus known as H1N1 which caused outbreaks over wide areas in 1933. It seemed to disappear and then return with devastating effects in the 1950's and again in the 1970's. Nobody knows where it went in the meantime. In the in-between periods it was never found anywhere. These phenomena are explained by using the tale of 'dormant viruses,' but nobody has ever come close to proving that this could be a possibility. This raises the same old two questions: Why did it not cause any symptoms wherever it was hiding? If it was hiding somewhere, how did it spread so quickly when it did, as you can't catch it. . .not from a human, not from an animal?
It was already mentioned that they are very small, and they weren't detected until 1943 with the invention of the electron microscope. Many, including HIV, have ten or fewer genes, whereas the simplest bacteria require several thousand. To create a living thing you need properly organised DNA of a substantial quantity, which the virus hasn't got.
We define "a living organism" as something that performs three tasks in succession: taking in stuff (eating, breathing), metabolising stuff (digesting, absorbing), and excreting waste. A fourth necessary task is reproduction. A virus doesn't do any of these. No virus does. Within the viral capsule there are no other structures that are required for a metabolic process. There is no activity at all inside the viral capsule. Not only doesn't it look structurally as if it's alive, it also isn't alive in physiological terms.
So what is it then? As we all know, viruses can have devastating effects on the health of plants, animals. . .great and small, including bacteria. . .and humans. HOW DOES IT PRODUCE THESE EFFECTS, IF IT IS NOT ALIVE, CAN'T BE CAUGHT AND DOESN'T REPRODUCE?
Known scientific facts about viruses and the way they function are obtained from chemical analysis and looking at still pictures from electron microscopes. The story is pieced together, not actually observed! This means that WHAT YOU ARE TOLD HAPPENS IS ACTUALLY A THEORY AT BEST, AND A FANTASY STORY AT WORST.
TO BE CONTINUED. . .
No comments:
Post a Comment